Who wrote the following line:
“O my Luve is
like a red, red rose” That’s newly
sprung in June;
(1) John Donne (2)
Spenser
(3) Robert Burns (4)Francesco Petrarca (usually called
Petrarch)
Ans. Rober Burns
Who wrote the following line:
“O my Luve is
like a red, red rose” That’s newly
sprung in June;
(1) John Donne (2)
Spenser
(3) Robert Burns (4)Francesco Petrarca (usually called
Petrarch)
Ans. Rober Burns
Yes, there is a difference in meaning between the two sentences:
1. "I was watching a movie by eating some popcorn."
- This suggests that eating some popcorn is the method by which you were watching the movie. It implies a cause-and-effect relationship where eating popcorn is instrumental to watching the movie, which doesn't quite make logical sense since eating popcorn is not a method for watching a movie. This sentence is grammatically correct but semantically odd.
2. "I was watching a movie eating some popcorn."
- This simply describes two actions happening at the same time: watching a movie and eating some popcorn. It means that while you were watching the movie, you were also eating popcorn. This sentence is natural and commonly used.
So, adding "by" introduces a method or means relationship which is not appropriate in this context, whereas omitting "by" just describes simultaneous actions, which makes sense here. Therefore, the sentences are not the same, and the removal of "by" changes the meaning to a more logical and natural one.
The line "My love is like a red, red rose" is from the poem "A Red, Red Rose" written by the Scottish poet Robert Burns in 1794.
Who wrote the following line: “O my Luve is like a red, red rose” That’s newly sprung in June; (1) John Donne ...